I think this highly depends on a person’s character - sensitive or insensitive for instance. Communicating online makes it even harder to know one’s emotion behind the screens/comments.
I am kinda agree with Richard that the issues with label "good first issue” could be treated a little more cautious to encourage more new contributors - suppose passing the regular review process of course. > On Sep 17, 2019, at 3:53 PM, Richard Levitte <[email protected]> wrote: > > You forget that this is done in public, i.e. others are looking at how > we treat those who do come forward and submit code to some bite size > issue. So while @agnosticdev may have enough skin on his nose, > onlookers that are considering whether they should contribute may not. > > On Tue, 17 Sep 2019 09:04:21 +0200, > Dr. Matthias St. Pierre wrote: >> >> I appreciate your concerns Richard, but I believe they are unwarranted in >> this >> case fortunately. >> >> First, my impression is that the discussion between was objective all the >> time >> and far from being heated up with emotions. >> >> Second, looking at the profile of the contributor, one can assert that he >> might >> be relatively new to our project, but he is certainly experienced in Open >> Source >> development. So I wouldn't worry too much about his feelings 😉 >> >> Regards, >> Matthias >> > -- > Richard Levitte [email protected] > OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org/~levitte/ Regards, Paul Yang
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP
