> Part of the idea was that this would be a means of communication
between application and provider, just like controls are with
libcrypto sub-systems.
I can probably find the email thread (or maybe it was a GitHub comment on my
proposal for params), where you said, quite definitively, that this was *not* a
general-purpose mechanism but rather a way to expose the necessary internals
for opaque objects like RSA keys.
What changed your mind?
Perhaps not surprisingly, I agree with Shane's assessment and am strongly
opposed to the project foisting this on everyone at this time. @DavidBen, your
thoughts?
