For those wanting to follow what's happening in QUIC space, this is a good place to start: https://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/quic/about/
In message <[email protected]> on Mon, 12 Nov 2018 11:33:23 +0100 (CET), Richard Levitte <[email protected]> said: > QUIC was mentioned a little more than a year ago. Since then, it > seems that the drafts have moved forward with quite some speed: > > https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-quic-transport-16 > https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-quic-tls-16 > https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-quic-recovery-16 > > There seems to be an effort to have the next major HTTP version be > based on QUIC, at least if this blog is any indication: > > https://daniel.haxx.se/blog/2018/11/11/http-3/ > > So the question is, should we start taking a closer look? Last time, > it seems like the discussions were cautiously positive, but never > reached a conclusion. > > Thoughts? Anyone feeling enthusiastic and want to do something? > > Cheers, > Richard > > -- > Richard Levitte [email protected] > OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org/~levitte/ > _______________________________________________ openssl-project mailing list [email protected] https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-project
