In message <[email protected]> on Sun, 7 Oct 2018 14:48:55 +0200, Kurt Roeckx <[email protected]> said:
> We're currently still targetting C89/C90 + long long, yet use > various features of C99 and even some C11 when it's available. > > C99 is now almost 20 years old, can we please move to at least > that? I'd like that. I've just had a look at the compilers I worry about, and I see no reason any more to stick with C89/C90. Cheers, Richard -- Richard Levitte [email protected] OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org/~levitte/ _______________________________________________ openssl-project mailing list [email protected] https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-project
