On Tue, 15 Jul 2014 13:30:18 -0400, Monty Brandenberg wrote: > None of the solutions here is particularly attractive but ensuring > that run-time version is not less than compile-time version gives > us a chance.
Agreed, but then we should make sure to compile the viewer against a version that is sufficiently "old" so that every currently used Linux distro got the same or a newer version installed... For example, in Linux Rosa 2012 case (a relatively recent distro, that will be kept mainted till 2017), libpcre.so.0 (PCRE v7.xx) is the system library. In this case, won't it be safer to use PCRE 7 instead of v8 for the static libarry linked to the viewer pre-built libraries (AFAIK, it's only libcolladadom) ?... Henri. _______________________________________________ Policies and (un)subscribe information available here: http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/OpenSource-Dev Please read the policies before posting to keep unmoderated posting privileges
