On Jul 24, 2011, at 6:49 AM, Boroondas Gupte <slli...@boroon.dasgupta.ch> wrote:
> Is that somehow related to the compile flag mismatch mentioned in changeset
> 740d8b8e509f?
>
> If the lib binary indeed deviates from the API, shouldn't we try to fix the
> binary rather than hacking around these problems in the calling viewer code?
If I'm correct about that problem, then yes, the "right" fix would be to
repackage our Boost library tarball, at least for Windows. Had I been writing
viewer code, I would have tried that.
This particular bit of code was to add tests, and I was trying to get it done
fairly quickly as my schedule window was closing. I was unaware that this
problem was biting anyone else; indeed I assumed that if it had, it would
already have been fixed.
May I recommend filing a Jira explaining the link errors you're encountering,
along with the Boost mailing-list link and the cited Microsoft page?
_______________________________________________
Policies and (un)subscribe information available here:
http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/OpenSource-Dev
Please read the policies before posting to keep unmoderated posting privileges
