Can you make the links verbose and compare the options? Also, why would first and second links differ?
Could be that CV did a major revision of the make files, or CMake, or whatever is being used. On Sun, Jan 16, 2011 at 10:49 AM, Aleric Inglewood < aleric.inglew...@gmail.com> wrote: > I'm afraid that VWR-24366 won't reduce link times significantly. > > On Fri, Jan 14, 2011 at 11:49 PM, Boroondas Gupte > <slli...@boroon.dasgupta.ch> wrote: > > On 01/14/2011 06:04 PM, Jonathan Welch wrote: > > > > I just did a quick study on link times for various viewers on my 2Gb XP > > system > > > > Viewer 1st link 2nd link > > CV 1.22 0:53 0:24 > > SG 1.5 3:30 2:07 > > V2.5 6:18 6:01 > > > > The long time for 2.5 be due to VWR-24366. Dunno why linking Cool Viewer > > (that's what "CV" stands for, isn't it?) is so much quicker than SG 1.5, > > though. > > > > Good news: A fix is being reviewed at > > https://codereview.secondlife.com/r/95/ > > > > Cheers, > > Boroondas > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Policies and (un)subscribe information available here: > > http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/OpenSource-Dev > > Please read the policies before posting to keep unmoderated posting > > privileges > > > _______________________________________________ > Policies and (un)subscribe information available here: > http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/OpenSource-Dev > Please read the policies before posting to keep unmoderated posting > privileges >
_______________________________________________ Policies and (un)subscribe information available here: http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/OpenSource-Dev Please read the policies before posting to keep unmoderated posting privileges