Can you make the links verbose and compare the options?  Also, why would
first and second links differ?

Could be that CV did a major revision of the make files, or CMake, or
whatever is being used.

On Sun, Jan 16, 2011 at 10:49 AM, Aleric Inglewood <
aleric.inglew...@gmail.com> wrote:

> I'm afraid that VWR-24366 won't reduce link times significantly.
>
> On Fri, Jan 14, 2011 at 11:49 PM, Boroondas Gupte
> <slli...@boroon.dasgupta.ch> wrote:
> > On 01/14/2011 06:04 PM, Jonathan Welch wrote:
> >
> > I just did a quick study on link times for various viewers on my 2Gb XP
> > system
> >
> > Viewer  1st link  2nd link
> > CV 1.22    0:53      0:24
> > SG 1.5      3:30      2:07
> > V2.5         6:18      6:01
> >
> > The long time for 2.5 be due to VWR-24366. Dunno why linking Cool Viewer
> > (that's what "CV" stands for, isn't it?) is so much quicker than SG 1.5,
> > though.
> >
> > Good news: A fix is being reviewed at
> > https://codereview.secondlife.com/r/95/
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Boroondas
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Policies and (un)subscribe information available here:
> > http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/OpenSource-Dev
> > Please read the policies before posting to keep unmoderated posting
> > privileges
> >
> _______________________________________________
> Policies and (un)subscribe information available here:
> http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/OpenSource-Dev
> Please read the policies before posting to keep unmoderated posting
> privileges
>
_______________________________________________
Policies and (un)subscribe information available here:
http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/OpenSource-Dev
Please read the policies before posting to keep unmoderated posting privileges

Reply via email to