On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 11:25 AM, Mike Monkowski <monko...@fishkill.ibm.com>wrote:
> > Small changes cannot fix the 2.x UI. You really have only two > reasonable choices: revert the look and feel back to 1.x or make the UI > completely customizable. > +1 for customization. Yoz has shown a more levelheaded approach to the UI problem than Oz Linden. Both are under LL corporate constraints, to be sure. I see 5 streams of development, going forward: * 1.x TPVs that cherry pick the best bits of V2 features * 2.x TPVs that cherry pick the best bits of V2 features, and in some cases, offer patches to go back into the official 2.x stream * 2.x LL viewer, where developers decide they can work with the process and constraints of LL * exploratory work at developing a viewer with Unity as a foundation * everything else (Ajax, iPhone, Android, etc) I dont think 5 streams are sustainable, but that is where we seem to be at the moment. A customizable UI would do much to circle the 1.x and 2.x development effort wagons. -- Daniel Smith - Sonoma County, California http://daniel.org/resume
_______________________________________________ Policies and (un)subscribe information available here: http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/OpenSource-Dev Please read the policies before posting to keep unmoderated posting privileges
