Definitely much more acceptable now. Thanks Joe
- Nexii On Sat, Apr 24, 2010 at 2:01 PM, Thickbrick Sleaford < thickbrick.sleaf...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Tuesday 20 April 2010 17:02:26 Joe Linden wrote: > > Boy, > > > > There was nothing quiet, or "in the background" about it, believe me. > This > > update is the topic of conversation at the noon PDT brown bag I'm hosting > > today. The changes were pushed live ahead of the meeting, so there would > > be no question they are incorporated in to the TPV and TOS, both of > which > > are effective on 4/30. > > > > I'll see those of you still interested in the subject at noon here: > > > http://maps.secondlife.com/secondlife/Linden%20Estate%20Services/229/230/29 > > > > -- joe > > > > This is somewhat belated, but: Thank you Joe! > > The TPVp is still not ideal from my perspective, but it is now certainly > something I think an open source community can work with. > > I still wish it would not force viewers to enforce DRM, specifically in > cases > where the user has an appropriate license from the creator that supersedes > the > DRM. But I guess this is pretty much a given when a user chooses to create > their content in a grid that is very much DRM-centric. Hopefully the DRM > will > be extended soon to include an "export ok" flag, now that the TPVp made it > a > critical thing. > > Anyway, thanks for listening! > > -- > Thickbrick > _______________________________________________ > Policies and (un)subscribe information available here: > http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/OpenSource-Dev > Please read the policies before posting to keep unmoderated posting > privileges >
_______________________________________________ Policies and (un)subscribe information available here: http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/OpenSource-Dev Please read the policies before posting to keep unmoderated posting privileges
