Except for Merov's contributions, I don't think Snowglobe ever had a planned direction. The direction was just the sum of the contributions people made to it. And I expect it will continue that way. If someone thinks that chat needs to be fixed and they have the time to fix it, then they probably will. The real question is whether such a contribution would be accepted. I happen to think it would be dangerous to reject such a contribution.
Mike Argent Stonecutter wrote: > Where is Snowglobe 2.0 going with this? Where SHOUDL it go? Should it > simplify the interface (or allow it to be simplified), restoring the > sim name and location to the title bar, cleaning up the chat and > message boxes, and so on? _______________________________________________ Policies and (un)subscribe information available here: http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/OpenSource-Dev Please read the policies before posting to keep unmoderated posting privileges
