On Tue, 9 Mar 2010 14:47:35 +0000 Morgaine <morgaine.din...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> I believe that they're seeking better-informed legal counsel on GPL > compliance first, before redrafting the TPV. The first version > conflated users, viewers and developers so terribly that GPLv2 clause > 6 was left in tatters. Joe's phrasing is the only one that makes the > necessary separation so far. I hope he has a hand in the redraft. :-) I think yoiu've misreaded the TPV policy, no GPL violation, viewer code is GPL, you can take a copy from svn, manipulate it, patch or mood, rename it, all GPL let u do with it (and consequential charges for a developer who work on a GPL code) TPV is like an addendum to TOS, if you want use Linden Lab grids you should follow some rules... this is server side, no viewer code involved... the Linden services aren't GPL... _______________________________________________ Policies and (un)subscribe information available here: http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/OpenSource-Dev Please read the policies before posting to keep unmoderated posting privileges
