You could pay the original author(s) to do it AGAIN I guess. Or hope that they for some insane reason are interested to use 2.0 themselves and are willing to redo that patch AGAIN for themselves.
I usually ask 50 euro per hour for coding that I don't like. It's time Linden Lab starts to pay us for our skills (in L$ if they wish). After all they make this advertisement with "that Second Life allows you make money with Real Life skills". I spend a whole DAY doing SNOW-84 AGAIN, now I need another month to cool off again. Can anyone tell me why so many freaking CRASH bug fixes have been completely ignored by Linden Lag? I mean, I already had the feeling the internal devs don't LIKE the Snowglobe project, but now I know so. I don't think that SG as a project makes sense anymore. We could and probably should put our time and effort into helping other viewers. What is the use of scattering all the devs over so many different forks? Yes, snowglobe is just another Third Party fork, and each time LL changes their code, we have to work hard to the full merge until we can't keep up anymore. On Tue, Mar 2, 2010 at 11:05 PM, Tayra Dagostino <tayra.dagost...@gmail.com>wrote: > is there a way to port the login database patch to SL2? > _______________________________________________ > Policies and (un)subscribe information available here: > http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/OpenSource-Dev > Please read the policies before posting to keep unmoderated posting > privileges >
_______________________________________________ Policies and (un)subscribe information available here: http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/OpenSource-Dev Please read the policies before posting to keep unmoderated posting privileges
