Ondřej,

Good spotting!

Actually I had a duplicate rid=112 in olcSyncrepl, but I never would have 
thought that monitor_back_register_entry is related to syncrepl.
Problem was caused by a configuration script using the wrong variable...

Kind regards,
Ulrich Windl

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ondřej Kuzník <[email protected]>
> Sent: Thursday, July 3, 2025 11:14 AM
> To: Windl, Ulrich <[email protected]>
> Cc: [email protected]
> Subject: [EXT] Re: Q: "monitor_back_register_entry("cn=Consumer
> 112,cn=Database 1,cn=Databases,cn=Monitor"): entry exists"
> 
> Sicherheits-Hinweis: Diese E-Mail wurde von einer Person außerhalb des
> UKR gesendet. Seien Sie vorsichtig vor gefälschten Absendern, wenn Sie auf
> Links klicken, Anhänge öffnen oder weitere Aktionen ausführen, bevor Sie
> die Echtheit überprüft haben.
> 
> On Thu, Jul 03, 2025 at 06:51:21AM +0000, Windl, Ulrich wrote:
> > Hi!
> >
> > For openldap-2.5 and an MMR configuration I see the message
> > monitor_back_register_entry("cn=Consumer 112,cn=Database
> > 1,cn=Databases,cn=Monitor"): entry exists during startup. I'm
> > wondering what the messages actually says, and what causes it. Could
> > it be some bug in OpenLDAP? The machine in question is real hardware
> > (no VM) and it has a *lot* of RAM (500G) and CPUs (64).
> 
> Hi Ulrich,
> are you sure you're not using duplicate rid= values in your
> configuration?
> 
> Regards,
> 
> --
> Ondřej Kuzník
> Senior Software Engineer
> Symas Corporation                       http://www.symas.com
> Packaged, certified, and supported LDAP solutions powered by OpenLDAP

Reply via email to