Hello, Thanks for your answer. I’m not an acl guru and it’s on our main directory setup, so I prefer to be sure before cleaning my acls.
f.g. > Le 13 janv. 2025 à 13:05, Ondřej Kuzník <[email protected]> a écrit : > > On Fri, Jan 10, 2025 at 05:23:24PM +0100, Frédéric Goudal wrote: >> I’m working on the acl on my ldap, and I have found a rule that puzzle >> me on it’s last statement : >> >> by * +0 break >> >> Well as 0 means no access what does +0 mean ? On my opinion it does >> nothing and the statement is equivalent to : >> >> by * break >> >> Am I correct or do I miss something ? > > Hi Frédéric, > yes, they should be equivalent - the person/software that created them > probably wanted to avoid access being set back to "none" here or just > wanted to be a little more explicit about the same. > > Regards, > > -- > Ondřej Kuzník > Senior Software Engineer > Symas Corporation http://www.symas.com > Packaged, certified, and supported LDAP solutions powered by OpenLDAP — Frédéric Goudal Ingénieur Système, DSI Bordeaux-INP +33 556 84 23 11
