>>> chandan jain <[email protected]> schrieb am 09.03.2021 um 10:58 in Nachricht <camojrsxkohnv0fp_gwoeeadnzdxeliq3ajr-w0pjjgft5kb...@mail.gmail.com>: > Thanks, > > Mirror mode configuration cannot be horizontal scaled what I understood as > writes are going to one of the node, and other act as an active standby. > > I want 2 or more nodes behind a load balancer which can share read/write > load. A kind of active active setup.
I wonder: If you have a 2-node MMR setup fed through a loadbalancer for writing, it there really a performance benefit over sending all updates to one node that replicates the changes to the other? Regards, Ulrich > > Regards > Chandan Jain > > On Mon, Mar 8, 2021, 23:44 Quanah Gibson-Mount <[email protected]> wrote: > >> >> >> --On Sunday, March 7, 2021 8:39 PM +0530 chandan jain >> <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> > >> > >> > Thanks, Quanah >> > >> > >> > Is it possible to direct upgrade from 2.4.32 to latest version. >> >> If you (temporarily) stick with the same backend, and in this case, if >> that >> same backend is linked to the exact same version of BDB, yes. I.e., >> compile the back-bdb/hdb backends against the same version of BDB, >> upgrade, >> and then migrate to back-mdb. >> >> > Also, can we horizontal scale a 2 node mirror mode setup? I am confused >> > after seeing suggestions on different sites. >> >> I don't understand the question here. Mirror mode is just a configuration >> of MMR with a load balancer in front. >> >> --Quanah >> >> -- >> >> Quanah Gibson-Mount >> Product Architect >> Symas Corporation >> Packaged, certified, and supported LDAP solutions powered by OpenLDAP: >> <http://www.symas.com> >>
