I see.
Well, I think for starters i will move forward with version upgrade and 
eventually delta-sync.

Then I’ll comeback to this post.

Thank you always for the awesome support!!

Stay safe.

-Dave
On Aug 18, 2020, 6:57 PM -0400, Quanah Gibson-Mount <[email protected]>, wrote:
>
>
> --On Tuesday, August 18, 2020 7:42 PM -0400 Dave Macias <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
> > No, using syncrepl. Should we move to delta-syncrepl?
>
> Due to ITS#8125 which can't be fixed until 2.5, it's essentially mandatory
> if you want reliable replication in the 2.4 series.
>
> > I can agree with that. We are using the distro provided openldap package
> > and it's pretty key to our infrastructure. So having it up to date is
> > good. We have already tested this before and the migration to symas
> > openldap is very easy! Thank you for that.
> >
> > At least with my previous questions, are they any concerns in 2.4.51?
>
> I had a long list of questions related to your previous questions. Without
> answers to those questions, I can't say much more.
>
> Regards,
> Quanah
>
>
> --
>
> Quanah Gibson-Mount
> Product Architect
> Symas Corporation
> Packaged, certified, and supported LDAP solutions powered by OpenLDAP:
> <http://www.symas.com>

Reply via email to