Ulrich Windl wrote: >>>> Quanah Gibson-Mount <[email protected]> schrieb am 29.08.2019 um 15:41 in > Nachricht <2B407C076711C27AEF9EBD7E@[192.168.1.144]>: > >> >> --On Thursday, August 29, 2019 9:32 AM +0200 Ulrich Windl >> <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>>> I've seen this when an attribute is introduced into the cn=config >>>> database that's not part of the built‑in slapd schema. It can be >>>> harmless in that case. >>> >>> I grepped for the attribute in external schema files, but didn't find it. >>> As I found it when querying slapd, I conclude that the definition shown >>> above must be build into slapd. >> >> Using the power of the source, auditcontext is defined in the >> slapo-accesslog overlay. > > Right, > > found it there: > ( 1.3.6.1.4.1.4203.666.11.5.1.30 NAME 'auditContext' DESC 'DN of > auditContainer' SYNTAX 1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.12 SINGLE-VALUE > NO-USER-MODIFICATION USAGE dSAOperation ) > > But I did not find an object definition that uses that attribute (any more).
It is clearly an operational attribute. -- -- Howard Chu CTO, Symas Corp. http://www.symas.com Director, Highland Sun http://highlandsun.com/hyc/ Chief Architect, OpenLDAP http://www.openldap.org/project/
