Jürgen Baier wrote:
Hi,
I have a question about LMDB (I hope this is the right mailing list for such a
question).
I'm running a benchmark (which is similar to my intended use case) which does
not behave as I hoped. I store 1 billion key/value pairs in a single LMDB
database. _In a single transaction._ The keys are MD5 hash codes from random
data (16 bytes) and the value is the string "test".
The documentation about mdb_page_spill says (as far as I understand) that this
function is called to prevent MDB_TXN_FULL situations. Does this mean that my
transaction is simply too large to be handled efficiently by LMDB?
Yes.
--
-- Howard Chu
CTO, Symas Corp. http://www.symas.com
Director, Highland Sun http://highlandsun.com/hyc/
Chief Architect, OpenLDAP http://www.openldap.org/project/
