--On Monday, September 04, 2017 11:33 AM +0200 Ulrich Windl
<[email protected]> wrote:
Quanah Gibson-Mount <[email protected]> schrieb am 01.09.2017 um 21:58
in
Nachricht <2032476F3CBBE8B34FB96BAD@[192.168.1.30]>:
--On Friday, September 01, 2017 11:48 AM -0400 Douglas Duckworth
<[email protected]> wrote:
Vinyl records are back in style. So it seems slapd.conf and bdb.
Yeah, I got to spend 2+ hours with a customer today because they chose
to use back-bdb, and it lacks subtree rename... so something that
should have been trivial to resolve was a long drawn out process.
There are good reasons things have progressed beyond slapd.conf and
back-bdb.
I wonder: Aren't both mdb and bdb key-value databases? So if one backend
implements a subtree rename, the other could do it as well. I think it's
nor fair to blame BDB itself for that...
back-hdb supports subtree rename. Pay attention to the difference between
back-bdb and back-hdb, both which sit on top of BDB.
--Quanah
--
Quanah Gibson-Mount
Product Architect
Symas Corporation
Packaged, certified, and supported LDAP solutions powered by OpenLDAP:
<http://www.symas.com>
