On Sat, Apr 25, 2015 at 05:58:43PM +0530, dE wrote: > Does adding of the top object class (implicitly) make it possible to > add all attributes in the DIT to the entry? I'm talking about > attributes which are out of the 'MAY' in the most subordinate object > class the entry belong to.
If you really want to permit *any* attribute to be added to an entry, then you can add the ExtensibleObject objectclass. In general this is a *bad* thing to do. See RFC4512 section 4.3 for the definition. Andrew -- ----------------------------------------------------------------------- | From Andrew Findlay, Skills 1st Ltd | | Consultant in large-scale systems, networks, and directory services | | http://www.skills-1st.co.uk/ +44 1628 782565 | -----------------------------------------------------------------------
