--On February 22, 2013 4:02:24 AM -0800 Quanah Gibson-Mount <[email protected]> wrote:
> --On Friday, February 22, 2013 4:01 AM -0800 Howard Chu <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> That's pretty odd, if this same LDIF already loaded successfully on >> another machine. Generally I'd interpret this error to mean you have a >> lot of indexing defined and some entry is generating a lot of index >> values. But that doesn't seem true if you're using the same config as >> another machine. > > Stanford's replicas have a few hundred more indices than the master. > > --Quanah The master is not end user accessible and has enough indexes to support the processes that update the directory. Currently the master has 20 indexes. The slaves support a wide variety of applications and have 119 indexes. Note, in one of my iterations I also tested loading into back-hdb which worked just fine. Bill -- Bill MacAllister Infrastructure Delivery Group, Stanford University
