Thanks, Quanah, I'm in the process of building against the latest git pull I did today. I'll take your notes into account. I also found some references regarding epoll() versus select() (ref http://www.openldap.org/lists/openldap-devel/201212/msg00014.html ) and trying to figure if this is an avenue to pursue in a test build.
Bob --bs On Thu, 2013-02-21 at 13:19 -0500, Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote: > --On Thursday, February 21, 2013 9:27 AM -0800 Quanah Gibson-Mount > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > --On Thursday, February 21, 2013 8:35 AM -0500 "Robert W. Smith" > > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >> Hi, > >> > >> I am running a 4-way multi-master configuration with a number of slaves > >> in remote locations. I am currently running openldap 2.4.33 on top of > >> CentOS 6.3 (I built 2.4.33 from a modified base centos 6 spec file). I > >> was originally running the centos base openldap 2.4.23 using N-way > >> multimaster using the syncrepl configuration but I was having problems > >> with the masters and slaves staying in perfect sync--other than this > >> 2.4.23 was running stably since last spring. I'll try to be brief in what > >> has happened since Feb 1. > > > > Did you build openldap with debugging symbols? (-g) > > Did you disable optimization? (-O0) > > > > If so, I would advise submitting an ITS, with a full backtrace from gdb: > > > > <http://www.openldap.org/faq/data/cache/59.html> > > Oh, also make sure when make install is run, you don't strip the binaries > of the debug symbols (make install STRIP="") > > I would also warn against using the centos spec file, as it links to NSS > instead of OpenSSL. You probably want to look at > <http://ltb-project.org/wiki/download#openldap> > > --Quanah > > -- > > Quanah Gibson-Mount > Sr. Member of Technical Staff > Zimbra, Inc > A Division of VMware, Inc. > -------------------- > Zimbra :: the leader in open source messaging and collaboration
