Michael Str?der wrote: > >>>>> "Be liberal in what you receive and conservative in what you send" is > >>>>> a good old rule. > >>>> > >>>> If you change the subschema subentry you change something sent to the > >>>> client. > >>> > >>> I still don't understand what's so bad about being able to request the > >>> ordering of the 'cn' attribute. > >> > >> Actually the client could request that. > > > > The client does request that, it seems, but OpenLDAP produces an error. > > It requests a SortKeyList control on the attribute 'cn'. But OpenLDAP > > returns an error. > > No it does not what I meant.. > > > Here is the conversation for you inline: > > [..] > > Control > > controlType: 1.2.840.113556.1.4.473 (sortKeyList) > > criticality: True > > SortKeyList: 1 item > > SortKeyList item > > attributeType: cn > > Control > > controlType: 2.16.840.1.113730.3.4.9 > > (LDAP_CONTROL_VLVREQUEST VLV) > > controlValue: > > 308400000012020100020127a08400000006020101020100 > > ..as you can see above. Please read my posting more thoroughly.
Please rephrase your posting in more mundane words. -- Victor Sudakov, VAS4-RIPE, VAS47-RIPN sip:[email protected]
