Mark Coetser wrote: > > > > > >>>> the problem can be that Outlook use SSSVLV controls on attributes > > >>>> without ordering rules in OpenLDAP. Unfortunately, the 'name' > > >>>> attribute has no ordering rules, so you can't sort results on name > > >>>> (this includes, cn, sn, gn attributes, because they inherit from > > >>>> name). We do not have this limitation on AD (but it breaks LDAP > > >>>> standard).
Mark, Could you be more specific which LDAP standard it breaks? Is there an explicit prohibition for the 'name' attribute to have ordering rules? In the RFCs somewhere? -- Victor Sudakov, VAS4-RIPE, VAS47-RIPN sip:[email protected]
