I also have no issues if I run syncrepl with a provider and consumer. Only 
mirror mode. Perhaps I'll try downgrading openLDAP.


Thanks.

Mike

Date: Tue, 8 May 2012 16:54:25 -0400
From: [email protected]
To: [email protected]
CC: [email protected]
Subject: RE: pwdPolicySubentry & replication user

I run that version without issues, but my infrastructure is still using good 
old reliable low-bandwidth slurpd, which is no longer supported.

 

I don’t think syncrepl is sufficiently reliable yet, although others disagree.

 

--Charlie

 

From: Michael Starling [mailto:[email protected]] 

Sent: 2012 May 08 4:20 PM

To: [email protected]

Cc: openldap

Subject: RE: pwdPolicySubentry & replication user

 

Re: Take the issue to Redhat

Easier said than done.



The policy is what it is but I didn't think it would do any harm to see if 
anyone has run into this issue.





> Date: Tue, 8 May 2012 12:22:58 -0700

> From: [email protected]

> To: [email protected]

> CC: [email protected]

> Subject: RE: pwdPolicySubentry & replication user

> 

> --On Tuesday, May 08, 2012 3:07 PM -0400 Michael Starling 

> <[email protected]> wrote:

> 

> >

> > Unfortunately I have no choice as this is the latest available in the

> > RHEL tree and my company won't allow us to deviate and compile.

> 

> Then you will need to take issues to RedHat since your company has an 

> utterly broken policy.

> 

> --Quanah

> 

> --

> 

> Quanah Gibson-Mount

> Sr. Member of Technical Staff

> Zimbra, Inc

> A Division of VMware, Inc.

> --------------------

> Zimbra :: the leader in open source messaging and collaboration

       ------------------  CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE  ---------------

  This message, including any attachments, is for the sole use of the

intended recipient(s) and may contain privileged confidential information

protected by law. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution

of this message is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please

contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of this message.

       ------------------  CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE  ---------------              
                          

Reply via email to