I agree with that, I've been using delta-syncrepl here for a while and its much more reliable than syncrepl IMO. I did not found any consistency issue with the replication so far.
Thanks, Matheus Morais 2011/4/27 Quanah Gibson-Mount <[email protected]> > --On Wednesday, April 27, 2011 8:01 PM +0200 Michael Ströder < > [email protected]> wrote: > > Correct. >>> >> >> Couldn't this be the cause for delta-syncrepl to seem more reliable than >> normal syncrepl (without slapo-accesslog)? >> > > I don't think so, because that is on the master, not on the replicas. > Replicas still get changes in the order they were written to the master > (supposedly anyhow. ;) ). > > > --Quanah > > -- > > Quanah Gibson-Mount > Sr. Member of Technical Staff > Zimbra, Inc > A Division of VMware, Inc. > -------------------- > Zimbra :: the leader in open source messaging and collaboration > >
