-----Mensaje original----- De: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] En nombre de [email protected] Enviado el: jueves, 10 de febrero de 2011 18:02 Para: [email protected] Asunto: Re: Ldap with GroupOfUniqueNames + PosixGroups
Alejandro Gándara Álvarez wrote: > Hi list, > > > > I´m using slapd 2.4.11-1+lenny1, until now I was being using > posixgroup as objectclass for my groups, now we need to integrate ldap > with a new application which requires GroupofUniquesnames as > objectclass. > > > > My question is, can I have mix groups?. I mean, a group with two > objectclass as posixgroup and GroupofUniquenames. > > > > I´ve tried but I always get errors because of conflict with both > objectclass. And I cant delete posixgroup objectclass because I need > it to integrate with samba and other services. > > > > Could someone head me to the right way? Search the web for rfc2307bis.schema. rfc2307bis is an unoffical schema, but it works as a replacement for the old nis.schema. Test an update on a separate LDAP-Server. I think best is, to dump the hole database, replace the objectclass and reload the database to a new Test-Server. If it's working fine, do the same on your real LDAP-Server. You can not simple replace the schemas, because of the StructuralObjectclass of your current records. Good luck. PS I am using rfc2307bis for some years and don't have any problems. > > Thanks for all > > > > Alejandro Gándara -- Harry Jede Kronprinzenstraße 151 44135 Dortmund Germany Tel +49 231 522376 Email [email protected] Hi, Thanks for your answer I´ve tried what you said, I did the following steps: 1- Install new openldap server in other server (Version:2.4.17-2.1). 2- I copied rfc2307bis.schema as the new nis.schema. 3- I made dpkg-reconfigure slapd, to reconfigure everything with the new domain and creating a new BBDD. 4- When It try to add the first entry I got the following messages Duplicate attributeType: "1.3.6.1.1.1.1.0" 5-I went to /etc/ldap/schema and I ran grep -r "1.3.6.1.1.1.1.0" . and I only got one answer so Its right. This attribute is placed in nis.schema(rfc2307bis.schema). Could you tell me where is my fault. Thanks for all. Alejandro Gándara
