On Feb 3, 2011, at 9:16 AM, Emmanuel Lecharny <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 2/3/11 5:45 PM, Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote: >> >> On Feb 3, 2011, at 1:11 AM, Clément OUDOT<[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Le 3 février 2011 09:39, Olivier PAVILLA >>> <[email protected]> a écrit : >>>> Hi. >>>> I need your advice again :) >>>> I have LDAP server with ldbm database on a fedora core 5 which is >>>> running for more than 3 years without any update nor upgrade neither. So >>>> now I've to migate this old LDAP on a new server with new Linux >>>> distribution (Debian Lenny). I'm tune up both /etc/ldap/slapd.conf and >>>> /var/lib/ldap/DB_CONFIG. But right now I read on a website >>>> (http://linagora.org/contrib/annuaires/documentations/openldap_guide_installation) >>>> that backend bdb will disappear. Should I use backend hdb or it doesn't >>>> make something different? >>> Hi Olivier, >>> >>> we never write that bdb will disappear, but just than it is now better >>> to use hdb. Maybe someone on this list can argue ont this >> As far as I am aware, you are not a member of the OpenLDAP project team, so >> I am not sure why you write emails that tend to imply that you are. > If you re-read Clément's mail, he does not claim to be a member of the > OpenLDAP team. He just said : > > "we never write (implied : on the Linagora's blog) that bdb will disappear..." > > Clément is a Linagora's Employee, and he carefully replied that what's on the > Linagora's blog can be challenged by people on this list. That was a sane > mail, IMO. Thanks for the clarification. It was not clear to me what the "we" referred to. In this case then if they clarify that back-bdb is what will eventually go away, then the blog is quite correct. --Quanah
