On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 5:57 PM, Howard Chu <[email protected]> wrote: > Shankar Anand R wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> Is there any workaround way by which we will be able to do a DIGEST-MD5 - >> SASL >> LDAP bind asynchronously? >> >> Howard: Is there a plan to have an asynchronous ldap_sasl_interactive_bind >> in >> the near future? Any time lines for that? >> > > No future plan. It's in CVS as of October 13, so it's already in the past. >
Great! Thanks for the information. I understand that the openldap project does not follow strict release dates. But I see that there is an average of 3 months between 2.4.x and 2.4.x+1. Can you help me by giving an approximate date when 2.4.24 will be released (with this fix)? > > Thanks, >> Shankar >> >> >> On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 3:06 PM, Howard Chu <[email protected] >> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >> >> William Ahern wrote: >> >> Excepting DNS, is the latest release of OpenLDAP fully >> asynchronous-capable, >> even with TLS? Perusing the source code I can't find any obvious >> places >> other than DNS where things might block, but it's harder to prove >> the >> negative. >> >> I remember many years ago this wasn't the case, and I had to thread >> the >> connect phase, but the ChangeLog suggests that things have changed >> considerably. >> >> >> Connect has been asynch for years, though an option to configure the >> connect timeout is a more recent addition. >> >> The only significant thing left that I can think of that's still only >> synchronous is ldap_sasl_interactive_bind_s(), and I have some plans to >> fix that. >> -- >> -- Howard Chu >> CTO, Symas Corp. http://www.symas.com >> Director, Highland Sun http://highlandsun.com/hyc/ >> Chief Architect, OpenLDAP http://www.openldap.org/project/ >> >> >> > > -- > -- Howard Chu > CTO, Symas Corp. http://www.symas.com > Director, Highland Sun http://highlandsun.com/hyc/ > Chief Architect, OpenLDAP http://www.openldap.org/project/ >
