Hi Volker, On Feb 27, 2011, at 14:33 , Volker Mische wrote:
> Hi, > > On 27.02.2011 08:20, [email protected] wrote: >> The primary problem with Gitorious is that maintaining a list of actively >> developed forks in a way that others can see it requires active core >> developer maintenence (or even non-core developer maintenance). Anything >> that we can get rid of in that vein, I think will be better for the >> project overall. > > For me Gitorious gives you a better overview of the forks of a project. It is > more Project oriented, rather than poeple oriented as Github. At Gitorious > you have a feed of what's going on in the forks. You can get the same in Github if you follow people that have forked your project. And you know from the project page who has forked it. Andreas. > > Though I have to admit that Gitorious has annoying limitation, like no way to > have (commit) hooks. > > Cheers, > Volker > _______________________________________________ > Dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/openlayers-dev -- Andreas Hocevar OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org/ Expert service straight from the developers. _______________________________________________ Dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/openlayers-dev
