Impressive improvement, thanks for the amazing work you are doing with this.
Cheers Paul On 2011-01-17, at 8:08 AM, Xavier Mamano (jorix) wrote: > > Hi developers, > > OpenLayers is not ready to use Closure Compiler ADVANCED_OPTIMIZATIONS. > Now the resulting code fails. > > With adjustments in the source, the resulting code can run, and the > result is: 46 kb for lite.cfg, less than 40% of "jsmin" try > http://xamamano.appspot.com/ol/46kb/example.html this > (with basic changes get 57kb, see > http://code.google.com/intl/ca/closure/compiler/docs/api-tutorial3.html#propnames > Inconsistent Property Names ; > and with more work is obtained 46kb, see "very pure javascript" > in > http://osgeo-org.1803224.n2.nabble.com/OpenLayers-without-warnings-using-the-Closure-Compiler-in-VERBOSE-mode-tc5916529.html > OpenLayers without warnings... ) > > I have several reasons to believe that the use of advanced optimizations > is inappropriate to distribute the OpenLayers code. > ADVANCED_OPTIMIZATIONS can only be suitable for building customized > projects, but currently is unbeatable in this area. > > NOTE: All calculations are not including the license (5kb) > > Regards, > > Xavier Mamano > > -- > View this message in context: > http://osgeo-org.1803224.n2.nabble.com/Advanced-Closure-Compiler-for-OpenLayers-lite-cfg-46-kb-tp5931700p5931700.html > Sent from the OpenLayers Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > _______________________________________________ > Dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/openlayers-dev __________________________________________ Paul Spencer Chief Technology Officer DM Solutions Group Inc http://research.dmsolutions.ca/ _______________________________________________ Dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/openlayers-dev
