On Wed, 25 Mar 2026 09:54:34 GMT, Marius Hanl <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Well, the sorting mystery has been solved! Same idea applies to > > `TreeTableView`. > > That's also the code location I found. What I was wondering here: since this > is a sort operation, no items should be removed at all, right? Because then, > we can remove this code completely. But needs more checks. That is a good point. That branch of code is never executed in my application. However, I use the `DEFAULT_SORT_POLICY`, which itself is probably not atomic. If the user provides their own sort policy, all bets are off. ------------- PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jfx/pull/2100#issuecomment-4126872547
