You're reading too much into that stack trace. Threads 2 and 3 both were created by library calls, probably to look up some relevant information or to be notified of device related events. So no, nobody rewrote a utility that doesn't need threads to use them anyway.
> On Mar 1, 2021, at 19:45, Reginald Beardsley via openindiana-discuss > <[email protected]> wrote: > > That a seldom used admin utility would be rewritten as a threaded application > says that those responsible for this idiocy were solely interested in adding > "threaded programming" to their resumes. I neither know nor care if the > programmer was at fault or the manager who permitted it was at fault. In any > case it is so stupid as to begger belief. Sadly I have seen many people do > something similar.
_______________________________________________ openindiana-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss
