[email protected] (Volker A. Brandt) writes:
[...] >> So should I create the zfs fs by >> zfs create ... -o mountpoint=/usr/local p0/local >> zfs create ... p0/local/src >> zfs create ... p0/local/src/git >> >> (the -p option may be useful above.. I just want it >> to be clear what is being done) >> >> ending with /usr/local/src/git >> >> OR like this: >> >> zfs create ... -o mountpoint=/usr/local p0/local >> zfs create ... -o mountpoint=/usr/local/src p0/src >> zfs create ... -o mountpoint=/usr/local/src/git p0/git > > Certainly the former. If you use the second version, all three moint- > points will be "local". In the first version, the second (src) and > third mountpoints will be "inherited". > > So if you one day decide that you have seen the light and want to con- > vert to The One True local Mountpoint as Our Lord Intended It, you can > just change the first mount point to /opt/local, and the rest will > automatically inherit the new setting. Thanks for your thoughts. Sounds like the inherited mount point rates pretty high in your notion of what works best. I suspect you have other reasons as well, and I would like to hear about them if you don't mind expounding a bit more. For example: What baring[sp] would either way have on the ability to `send/receive'? I'm very inexperienced in send/receive: In the method you prefer, and the first on shown in OP, can $USER `send/receive' the whole of `local/src/git' in one move? Or would it need to be broken down into three send/receive sessions? _______________________________________________ openindiana-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss
