On Fri, Mar 24, 2017 at 5:43 PM, Harry Putnam <[email protected]> wrote: > > On the vm, I've created discs like so: > > 2 @ 96G > 2 @ 116G > 2 @ 216G > > These have just over 2x variation in size, and you put them all in a single raidz vdev, that is why your space is "missing" - it is just like making a mirror out of a 96G disk and a 216G disk, which would have only 96G available and "lose" over 100G of space. raidz doesn't do anything magical for different-sized disks - it uses a slice from each device that is equal to the *smallest* device in the vdev.
So, your raw space *before* parity or overhead (which is what "zpool list" says) should be 6*96G = 576G. Remove 1 device worth for raidz1 (5*96G = 480G), and a fudge factor for metadata overhead, and lands you at the 460G that "zfs list" says about it. Tim _______________________________________________ openindiana-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss
