Thanks for the FAT trick. I don't remember when the disk used to be NTFS, 1 or 2 years ago. I had to reformat it for compatibility issues with shiny hardware I don't manage.
I'll try to reformat it to NTFS and see how it goes. Best regards. Ben ----- Mail original ----- De: "Aurélien Larcher" <[email protected]> À: [email protected] Envoyé: Lundi 27 Juillet 2015 16:08:25 Objet: Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] USB 2 performance I guess it depends which filesystem you are using, but for FAT yes definitely. Maybe just a matter of block size in this case. Also make sure that USB2 is actually used, I found Solaris/illumos to fallback to USB1 on several occasions. Aurélien À lun. juil. 27 06:00:21 2015 GMT+0200, [email protected] a écrit : > I redid the test, it is more around 30-35 MB/s on other OS's actually. > > ----- Mail original ----- > De: [email protected] > À: "Discussion list for OpenIndiana" <[email protected]> > Envoyé: Lundi 27 Juillet 2015 15:56:33 > Objet: [OpenIndiana-discuss] USB 2 performance > > Hi, > > I always found the performance of USB devices connected to OI behind other OS. > Is it related to the implementation or is it just me (oi159a) ? > > For example, same drive transfer (one big file) is : > - 8MB/s on OI > - 45MB/s on Linux/Windows > > Ben > > _______________________________________________ > openindiana-discuss mailing list > [email protected] > http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss > > _______________________________________________ > openindiana-discuss mailing list > [email protected] > http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss > _______________________________________________ openindiana-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss _______________________________________________ openindiana-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss
