On 07/01/13 17:33, [email protected] wrote: >> Is 192.168.0.1 your NAT box (your "router")? >> > > 192.168.0.1 is the cisco router. > > 192.168.0.4 is the physical nic of the machine. (theotokos.dsicons.net) > > 192.168.0.3 is the "routert3" zone.
OK. That's a start. But that seems dirt simple, with the Cisco device (apparently) configured to provide NAT service to the network, and absolutely no ipfilter or port forwarding or NAT or anything like it needed on your system. That's where I'm confused. I cannot understand what you're attempting to do or why you have things configured the way you do. The typical ways to configure a home network like this depend on what sort of service you get from your ISP. If your ISP gives you multiple real IP addresses (192.168/16 is an RFC 1918 block; it's not routeable and not a public address), then one way to work things is to disable NAT in the Cisco box and set up ipfilter on the OpenIndiana system to provide filtering, NAT, and port forwarding as needed for the rest of your network. But, clearly, you're not doing that. If your ISP only gives you a single address, and you must use NAT in the Cisco box, then set up port forwarding for any of the services you wish to advertise to the world ON THE CISCO BOX. The guy doing the NAT must be the guy doing any port forwarding; it makes no sense at all otherwise. In that case, you most likely wouldn't want or need ipfilter configuration on the OpenIndiana system, except perhaps for some simple stateless filters; no NAT or forwarding. What you're describing doesn't seem to fit any of the typical usage patterns, so I'm confused. >>> How do I get rid of the third line? >> >> What's the "third line?" Do you mean this one? >> >>> 192.168.0.0 192.168.0.4 U 4 83 bnx0 >> > > yes. You can't get rid of it, you don't want to, and it's not incorrect. That's an interface route. >> If you mean some other line, then please specify, as I can see nothing >> wrong with the output you've provided. >> > > Is it correct that my gateway of 192.168.0.4 is the same as my nic of my > server? Yes, of course. It's an interface route. You'd see the same sort of thing on many other systems with BSD-style stacks. -- James Carlson 42.703N 71.076W <[email protected]> _______________________________________________ OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss
