If the targets are mirrored via ZFS and COMSTAR, why would the Linux host require RAID? If it's using iSCSI anyway, wouldn't the Linux volume management just needlessly redundantize the data, that ZFS is mirroring already?
Or do I not understand your problem, or how ZFS works? My apologies if I'm talking out of my *EEE-HAW* ! ;) On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 7:25 PM, Christopher Chan < [email protected]> wrote: > On Thursday, November 15, 2012 08:23 PM, Florian wrote: > >> Am 15.11.2012 13:15, schrieb Jorge Palma: >> >>> raid1 at the OS level, but SPOF on network level..... >>> >> >> This is no Problem, I change a switch in 5 minutes, but the Server takes >> much longer. >> This was not my question! Thanks for the not helping help!!! >> > > Wow, you can change a switch in 5 mins? Nice that you have them > replacement switches preconfigured and ready to roll. But it would good if > you did some testing and pull the cable on the network switch out and see > what happens to your md device. Nevermind the having a switch ready to > replace in 5 minutes but for some reason not used. > > > ______________________________**_________________ > OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list > OpenIndiana-discuss@**openindiana.org<[email protected]> > http://openindiana.org/**mailman/listinfo/openindiana-**discuss<http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss> > -- " ' With the first link, the chain is forged. The first speech censured, the first thought forbidden, the first freedom denied, chains us all irrevocably.' Those words were uttered by Judge Aaron Satie as wisdom and warning... The first time any man's freedom is trodden on we’re all damaged." - Jean-Luc Picard, quoting Judge Aaron Satie, Star Trek: TNG episode "The Drumhead" - Alex Smith (K4RNT) - Dulles Technology Corridor (Chantilly/Ashburn/Dulles), Virginia USA _______________________________________________ OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss
