yes you are correct, without writing the Windows SID and using the idmap mechanism of CIFS it seems not possible - even during sessions because the idmap table is only created after a login of an SMB user.
Am 13.08.2012 um 20:22 schrieb Frank Lahm: > 2012/8/13 Günther Alka <[email protected]>: >> with SAMBA and winbind you may loose: >> >> - snaps via Windows previous version >> - Windows compatible ntfs4 ACL (only Posix ACL ?) >> - SMB as a ZFS property >> - interoperability with NFS4 >> - movable pools that keep ACL intact >> - performance, kernel based CIFS server is mostly faster >> - CIFS is managed by Illumos, not a third party product that cares mostly >> about Linux >> - napp-it integration >> >> From Windows and interoperability view CIFS is much better. >> A minimal solution may be using at least the UID/GID provided by idmap for >> already created AD users, optionally add a SID->UID/GID entry in this >> database. >> >> In this case, you do not write proper ACL but use at least the same UID/GID >> like CIFS >> I have not tried if CIFS is using the proper SID via idmap when there is >> only a UID/GID entry in files. > > What about the fact that ephemeral ids are not static ie discarded > when the server reboots? > > -f > > _______________________________________________ > OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list > [email protected] > http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss -- _______________________________________________ OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss
