In January, I got quite a way through the compilation procedure for LibreOffice (using gcc) but got stuck compiling the dictionaries, with possible errors in gcc causing some trouble,
I re-got the code from git last month, and the newer version of the code now compiles the dictionaries, but I cannot correctly compile the "tools" section ... If I have more time, in the future, I will try and tweak it again to get it to compile ... but it's not going to be very soon. Jon On 9 May 2012 21:50, Jan Owoc <[email protected]> wrote: > On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 2:12 PM, cpforum <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> After a long time, Apache Software Fondation published yesterday OpenOffice >> 3.4. >> >> Solaris/OpenIndiana binaries are not available yet ! (same for LibreOffice). >> > [...] >> >> Who knows ASF plans for Solaris11/Openindiana Aoo binaries ? > > There was an extensive discussion on this list in January [1] about > renewing a Solaris/OpenIndiana build of LibreOffice. Why do you want > OpenOffice specifically? > It was then decided that the proper place to discuss the topic would > be the LibreOffice devel mailing list [2]. I didn't follow that > thread, so don't know if any native build came out of it (I know > someone tested that the Windows build + wine appears to run). > > [1] > http://openindiana.org/pipermail/openindiana-discuss/2012-January/thread.html#6997 > [2] > http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice/2012-January/thread.html#24540 > > Jan > > _______________________________________________ > OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list > [email protected] > http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss _______________________________________________ OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss
