No, that's not it: I thought of that possibility, but my /usr/local is just another directory /usr.
And where did the man files go??

I'm actually thinking I would have liked to be able to trace what updatemanager did, after the fact.

Still, I now know I must do a snapshot at every step of any fishy pkg stuff.

And I've got the files back, and things work. Next time I'll be more observant.

On 2012-05-07 14:50, [email protected] wrote:
Message: 5
Date: Mon, 07 May 2012 07:21:32 -0400
From: James Carlson<[email protected]>
To: Discussion list for OpenIndiana
        <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] Massive numbers of man files,
        missing on 151a4
Message-ID:<[email protected]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

Hans J. Albertsson wrote:
>  I  managed to determine (ocular inspection of "ls" in several snapshots)
>  that the only files missing were about 1200 man pages in man1, and the
>  entire /usr/local tree.
> > And I think it must have happened as I removed the sfe version of
>  imagemagick.
One way I've seen this sort of thing happen is when an administrator
uses a symlink for a common directory (such as /usr/local), and a
package delivers a directory entry for that same path.  The packaging
system will happily blow the symlink away.

If that's what you've been doing, I suggest using mounts instead of
symlinks.  The simplest thing to do is to make /usr/local (or whatever
is being symlink'd) be a separate zfs file system.  Alternatively, if
separate file systems are not your taste for some reason, consider using
a lofs mount.  (Of course, getting that mount in place at boot time may
  be slightly tougher to do on a modern Open Indiana system, as zfs works
outside of the /etc/vfstab scheme.)

-- James Carlson 42.703N 71.076W <[email protected]>

_______________________________________________
OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss

Reply via email to