Deneva 2. -J
On Mon, Oct 31, 2011 at 5:42 PM, Rich <[email protected]> wrote: > Deneva 2 is based on the Vertex 3, not Vertex 2, as I understand it. > > Which are you asking about? > > - Rich > > On Mon, Oct 31, 2011 at 7:20 PM, Jason J. W. Williams > <[email protected]> wrote: >> Hi Ivar, >> >> I understand about the MLC vs. SLC distinction, but MLC is getting >> better and I'm more interested in anyone's real world experience with >> the reliability of the Deneva 2 drives. >> >> -J >> >> On Mon, Oct 31, 2011 at 5:18 PM, Ivar Janmaat <[email protected]> wrote: >>> Hello Jason, >>> >>> The idea is that MLC SSD isn't advised for ZIL. >>> SLC is a lot better because it can withstand writing to the diks 10x beter >>> than MLC SSDs. >>> The best solution however is a DRAM ZIL. >>> It has better sustained iops and will be much durable. >>> Suggested reading material: >>> http://www.ddrdrive.com/zil_accelerator.pdf >>> >>> Ivar >>> >>> Jason J. W. Williams schreef: >>>> >>>> Does anyone have experience using the OCZ MLC Deneva's for ZIL? >>>> Alternately the OCZ Vertex 2 EX SLC? >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -J >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list >>>> [email protected] >>>> http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss >>> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss >> > > _______________________________________________ > OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list > [email protected] > http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss > _______________________________________________ OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss
