On Sat, May 28, 2011 at 10:10 AM, Apostolos Syropoulos <[email protected]> wrote: > Alan Coopersmith has posted the following in his blog: > > > > http://blogs.oracle.com/alanc/entry/there_i_fixed_it > > > The question is why FD_SETSIZE takes the value 65536 in the 64bit model?
I would assume that whoever changed did not understand the implications of changing FD_SETSIZE from 1024 to 65536. Source code revision history may indicate why > What would happen if the default value would be, say, 2048? Sounds like a reasonable value, and represents 64MB of cache, as opposed to 2G for 65536 FDs. _______________________________________________ OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss
