The Solaris OS was carefully designed as a product, Linux is a combination of technollogies carefully developed to interact with eachother but created in independent projects. Both of them a very well made, but the way how all the parts within Solaris relate to eachother is more consistent.
Solaris and linux are like 2 different languages, both ritch on their own way, why shoulnt we write phylosopy in German? Cheers 2011/3/29 Thommy M. Malmström <[email protected]>: > On 29 March 2011 20:02, Apostolos Syropoulos <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> Unfortunately for your logic, that is exactly what I do. I spend 95% of >>> my time using solaris, 1% of my time using linux and 4% on other >>> flavours of stuff. They all have slight nuances and I have to learn >>> them. It's not hard. >>> >> >> Not everyone is a system administrator and not everyone wants to >> be one. I simply don't like Windows and I want a robust system to >> use, that's why I am using OpenIndiana. I guess there many people >> out there who are just like me. The more such people use OpenIndiana, >> the more the system will be popular. And this is the reason, OpenIndiana >> and Illumos must become as user-friendly as possible and even more. > > > But it's not a valid argument that just because Solaris doesn't have > the same commands as Linux it is not user-friendly. We who know > Solaris better than Linux can argue the same way to no usefulness. > They are different and will be. If you want user-friendliness, look at > the difference in creating disk pools and file systems. > > _______________________________________________ > OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list > [email protected] > http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss > _______________________________________________ OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss
