Not sure what you're trying to say. "zfs send snapshot | zfs receive filesystem"
produced no filesystem when I killed the job prematurely after copying 1+ GB which makes good sense. Far better not to create a munged filesystem. Note I tried this w/ S10 U8. I certainly encountered no problems starting and stopping the job or when I killed it. I wonder if your problem wasn't the pool "failmode=" setting. I had a panic w/ zfs 4 when I accidentally dropped power to the USB disk I was writing to. Rattled me pretty badly. Have Fun! Reg --- On Tue, 3/29/11, Jonathan Adams <[email protected]> wrote: > From: Jonathan Adams <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] [zfs-discuss] zfs incremental send? > To: "Discussion list for OpenIndiana" <[email protected]> > Date: Tuesday, March 29, 2011, 9:52 AM > Just to clarify; Our issue was we did > a send and receive in the same > pipe, when it died the receive died too, and that caused > trouble. the > send on it's own was alright, the receive caused problems. > > _______________________________________________ > OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list > [email protected] > http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss > _______________________________________________ OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss
