On Feb 13, 2011, at 2:13 PM, Ken Gunderson wrote: > I was just taking a second (well, actually third) look at this and the > more important baby (IMAP) was thrown out with the bath water (MTA > debate).
Both Cyrus (as perhaps most scalable/enterprise grade open source IMAP server) and Dovecot (backwards compatible with existing text mailboxes) may well have their place; one of those cases where, if keeping them both well maintained isn't too burdensome, choice would be desirable. (I've run UW imapd on Solaris 9 and later; poor performance, but for personal use only, the backward compatibility was a big deal, esp. since some Usenet readers can save to a text mbox file, and one can then use a mail client to read (and maybe even thread) the saved messages.) _______________________________________________ OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss
