Well you raise a good point. Lets not make the same mistakes that others have made. Learn from history so we don't repeat it, that will make the community stand out, thats what we want. We want people to know that we are here to continue the innovation that solaris and sun represented.
So instead of 'doing it like <insert name here>' lets start doing like the OpenIndiana community does. Lets see if somebody can come up with innovative model to handle all these issues. On 4 November 2010 09:24, Rthoreau <[email protected]> wrote: > I am surprised Alan did not bring this up, but what this reminded me off > was Xfree86 and Xorg. We heard all the gloom and doom about the distro's > not using Xfree86 when they switched to Xorg. I see the same approach > with Libre Office once it gets into the hands of the major Linux > distro's good luck getting Open Office on equal footing. > > I imagine a few people on the developers list could give us all a little > lesson on FLOSS or OSS community handling or lack of it. I was referring > to CDRkit and cdrecord and in no means am in a position to make > judgments on either one. Being a long time user of Debian my opinion > might be slightly biased so I will refrain from comment on the merits of > either source. I bring it up as an object lesson and nothing else. > > Which kind of reminds me of the IC patent wars back in those days. It seems > even back > then the judges and patent system were still a big mess. > > Rthoreau > > > _______________________________________________ > OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list > [email protected] > http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss > _______________________________________________ OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss
