Yes, I'd like to add alpha1, etc. version numbers in bugzilla. For existing bugs, the Reporter and Assignee should try to communicate/negotiate Priority/Severity. For bugs in areas that Cisco supports, I review the bugs and try to ask for desired ones to be fixed. I was happy with the responses I got for OFED 1.1 from Mellanox and Open MPI.
If you want a bug scrub, I suggest a distributed one, where someone from each company scrubs the bugs in areas they are responsible for. Scott > -----Original Message----- > From: Tziporet Koren [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, February 14, 2007 6:18 AM > To: Scott Weitzenkamp (sweitzen) > Cc: EWG; OPENIB > Subject: how to handle OFEd 1.2 bugs in bugzilla > > Hi Scott and all, > I wish to consult with you in the way we will treat OFED 1.2 bugs in > bugzilla. > > 1. Do we want to have 1.2-alpha 1.2-beta, 1.2-rcX in version, or just > 1.2 as we have now > 2. What do we wish to do with bugs that were opened for 1.1 and are > still open? > 3. What to do with old bugs that where open to gen2 in general? > 4. What is our methodology for priority and severity setup? > (There are > too many blocker bugs still open in OFED 1.1 so they are not > actually > blockers or they were fixed but not updated) > > Thanks, > Tziporet > _______________________________________________ openib-general mailing list [email protected] http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
