On Tue, 2007-02-13 at 13:01 -0500, Shaun Rowland wrote: > Roland Dreier wrote: > > > How do I tell? Can I tell from the .so files? > > > > ldd on the .so and the app would probably give you good info. > > > > I'm pretty sure that mpicc must be linking against an libibverbs 1.0 > > from somewhere. > > > > - R. > > When I build using the OFED-1.2-20070208-1508, libibverbs 1.0 is what is > built, at least by looking at the .so file result: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ ls /usr/local/ofed/lib64/ |grep ibverbs libibverbs.a > libibverbs.so > libibverbs.so.1 > libibverbs.so.1.0.0 > > This seems odd. Is it correct? I have updated the MVAPICH2 SRPM and sent > a new patch for the OFED install scripts. This won't be reflected until > the alpha1 release. Still, does the above seem strange? I noticed this > recently. I see symbols for both versions though: > > 0000000000005a50 T [EMAIL PROTECTED] > 00000000000082c0 T ibv_detach_mcast@@IBVERBS_1.1 > 0000000000000000 A IBVERBS_1.0 > 0000000000000000 A IBVERBS_1.1 > > Our code links to these libraries, and by default mpicc > should use what's in /usr/local/ofed/lib[64] in the -L path itself > directly too. Is this an issue in the library? The libmpich.so file > should not be any different when built. We will investigate this. > > I can provide a patch against the latest OFED tar.gz to use the > mvapich2-0.9.8-3.src.rpm once I download the release if that would help, > as we have changed some things since the -2 SRPM release. Again, this > should be reflected in the alpha1 release.
I was hoping to sniff-test mvapich2 over OFA/iWARP. So if you can get something that works I'll try it out. Steve. _______________________________________________ openib-general mailing list [email protected] http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
