Ah, great, I don't understand why I didn't see this reply, I'll pay more attention next time.
Sorry for the noise. Le mar. 19 déc. 2023, 16:05, Martin Jansa <[email protected]> a écrit : > Maybe you don't see them because they are already applied: > > https://git.openembedded.org/meta-openembedded/commit/?id=1f9ad22b28c24a289636b1eb049c491e4529337d > > and marked as such in patchwork, see: > > https://patchwork.yoctoproject.org/project/oe/list/?series=&submitter=&state=*&q=crash&archive=both&delegate= > > There was even reply from Khem saying they are applied, see: > > https://patchwork.yoctoproject.org/project/oe/patch/[email protected]/ > > Regards, > > > On Tue, Dec 19, 2023 at 3:55 PM Frederic Martinsons < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> Hello, >> >> I sent a series for adding cross canadian crash two days ago. >> >> But I didn't see these in patchwork: >> https://patchwork.yoctoproject.org/project/oe/list/ >> I thought that was automatic, did I miss something? >> >> Has someone in this list saw my patches or should I resent them ? >> >> On Wed, 6 Dec 2023 at 19:26, Frederic Martinsons via >> lists.openembedded.org <frederic.martinsons= >> [email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Ok great, I'll rebase these on master on the coming days. The problem is >>> that my hardware (pretty specifics) just have been upgraded with Kirkstone >>> and since I will not be able to test those on master branch. At least I can >>> make it compile, have you some advices to non regressed crash utility >>> (without involving real target test)? >>> >>> Le mer. 6 déc. 2023, 19:11, Khem Raj <[email protected]> a écrit : >>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On Wed, Dec 6, 2023 at 10:02 AM Frédéric Martinsons < >>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Hello list, >>>>> >>>>> Since some times (back to warrior branch I think), I have in my custom >>>>> layer a cross canadian version from the crash tool, I personnally used it >>>>> for analysing vmcore from an arm target (cortex a53) offline within the >>>>> sdk. >>>>> >>>>> I recently upgraded to kirsktone and the update of this version was a >>>>> little tricky (must have played with LDFLAGS, gdb target build and host >>>>> and >>>>> so on...) >>>>> >>>>> I finally managed to get crash working for all my hardware (both >>>>> include aarch64 and x86-64 arch). >>>>> >>>>> I would like to know if it would be acceptable to have a cross >>>>> canadian arch in meta-openembedded (from what I see, there is only native >>>>> and target flavor)? >>>>> >>>> >>>> It’s fine. I guess there were no such recipe needing it so far. Please >>>> submit your patches >>>> >>>> >>>>> If you think it is accurate, I'll work to push some patches against >>>>> master. >>>>> >>>>> Please tell me, thanks! >>>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> >> >> >>
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#107633): https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-devel/message/107633 Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/103018278/21656 Group Owner: [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-devel/unsub [[email protected]] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
